History of Multilateralism in Foreign Policy

Multilateralism is diplomatic term that refers to cooperation among several nations. President Barack Obama has made multilateralism a central element of U.S. foreign policy under his administration. Given the global nature of multilateralism, multilateral policies are diplomatically intensive but offer the potential for great payoffs. History of U.S. Multilateralism Multilateralism is largely a post-World War II element of U.S. foreign policy. Such cornerstone U.S. policies as the Monroe Doctrine (1823) and the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine (1903) were unilateral. That is, the United States issued the policies without the help, consent, or cooperation of other nations. American involvement in World War I, while it would seem to be a multilateral alliance with Great Britain and France, was in fact a unilateral venture. The U.S. declared war against Germany in 1917, almost three years after the war began in Europe; it cooperated with Great Britain and France simply because they had a common enemy; aside from combating the German spring offensive of 1918, it refused to follow the alliances old style of trench fighting; and, when the war ended, the U.S. negotiated a separate peace with Germany. When President Woodrow Wilson proposed a truly multilateral organization — The League of Nations — to prevent another such war, Americans refused to join. It smacked too much of the European alliance systems that had triggered World War I in the first place. The U.S. also stayed out of the World Court, a mediating organization with no real diplomatic weight. Only World War II pulled the U.S. toward multilateralism. It worked with Great Britain, the Free French, the Soviet Union, China and others in a real, cooperative alliance. At the end of the war, the U.S. became involved in a flurry of multilateral diplomatic, economic, and humanitarian activity. The U.S. joined the wars victors in the creation of: The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, 1944The United Nations (UN), 1945The World Health Organization (WHO), 1948 The U.S. and its Western allies also created the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949. While NATO still exists, it originated as a military alliance to throw back any Soviet incursion into western Europe. The U.S. followed that up with the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) and the Organization of American States (OAS). Although the OAS has major economic, humanitarian, and cultural aspects, both it and SEATO began as organizations through which the U.S. could prevent communism from infiltrating those regions. Uneasy Balance with Military Affairs SEATO and the OAS were technically multilateral groups. However, Americas political dominance of them tilted them toward unilateralism. Indeed, much of American Cold War policies — which revolved around containment of communism — tended in that direction. The United States entered the Korean War in the summer of 1950 with a United Nations mandate to push back a communist invasion of South Korea. Even so, the United States dominated the 930,000-man UN force: it supplied 302,000 men outright, and it outfitted, equipped, and trained the 590,000 South Koreans involved. Fifteen other countries provided the rest of the manpower. American involvement in Vietnam, coming without a UN mandate, was entirely unilateral. Both U.S. ventures in Iraq — the Persian Gulf War of 1991 and the Iraqi War that began in 2003 — had the multilateral backing of the UN and the involvement of coalition troops. However, the United States supplied the majority of troops and equipment during both wars. Regardless of label, both ventures have the appearance and feel of unilateralism. Risk Vs. Success Unilateralism, obviously, is easy — a country does what it wants. Bilateralism — policies enacted by two parties — are also relatively easy. Simple negotiations reveal what each party wants and does not want. They can quickly resolve differences and move ahead with policy. Multilateralism, however, is complicated. It must consider the diplomatic needs of many nations. Multilateralism is much like trying to arrive at a decision in a committee at work, or perhaps working on an assignment in a group in a college class. Inevitably arguments, divergent goals, and cliques can derail the process. But when the whole succeeds, the results can be amazing. The Open Government Partnership A proponent of multilateralism, President Obama has initiated two new U.S.-led multilateral initiatives. The first is the Open Government Partnership. The Open Government Partnership (OGP) seeks to secure transparent government functioning around the globe. Its declaration proclaims the OGP is committed to the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UN Convention against Corruption, and other applicable international instruments related to human rights and good governance. The OGP wants to: Increase accessibility to governmental information,Support non-discriminatory civic participation in governmentPromote professional integrity within governmentsUse technology to promote openness and accountability of governments. Eight nations now belong to the OGP. They are the United States, United Kingdom, South Africa, the Philippines, Norway, Mexico, Indonesia, and Brazil. Global Counterterrorism Forum The second of Obamas recent multilateral initiatives is the Global Counterterrorism Forum. The forum is essentially a place where states practicing counterterrorism can convene to share information and practices. Announcing the forum on September 22, 2011, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, We need a dedicated global venue to regularly convene key counterterrorism policy makers and practitioners from around the world. We need a place where we can identify essential priorities, devise solutions, and chart a path to implementation of best practices. The forum has set four major goals in addition to sharing information. Those are: Discover how to develop justice systems rooted in the rule of law but effective against terrorism.Find cooperative ways to globally understand the radicalization of ideals, terrorist recruitment.Find ways to strengthen weaknesses — such as border security — that terrorists exploit.Ensure dynamic, strategic thinking and action about counterterrorism efforts.

In General Terms, Democracy Is Characterized As A Government

In general terms, democracy is characterized as a government in which citizens have the capabilities to exercise political autonomy to influence the affairs of the state. To be more precise, citizens are able to exercise direct control over the government—as in the case of pure democracies—or they are able to exercise indirect control—as in the case of representative democracies. Of course this general characterization is an oversimplification of what a democracy is and precisely how it functions. However, the ability of the citizenry to influence state affairs is the bedrock that generally constitute a democracy. In an attempt to further sharpen this concept, I found it necessary in my previous paper to consider what democracy looks†¦show more content†¦Second, in recognizing that democracy can take on the extreme of these tendencies, my characterization now includes the assumption that democracy requires a relative nature—a constant shift between consolidation and decentralization—to guard against the possibilities of tyranny by the minority or the majority. Lastly, in recognizing these possibilities, my definition now assumes that the role of the citizenry should be to understand the relative nature of democracy and the implications it has regarding political power and the stability of the state. While I have incorporated these additional assumptions, I still retained my definition: democracy is a relative struggle between consolidation and decentralization. As such, I have found much support and reinforcement from the different theorist and literatures explored this semester. In my first revision of my original conception of democracy, I eliminated the restrictions that tied the driving tendencies of democracy to oligarchism and anarchism, and expanded these tendencies to all notions of consolidating or decentralizing political power. As such, my argument is that democracy is driven by two opposing forces that aims to consolidate political power in the hands of a few, or decentralize political power in theShow MoreRelated Jacksonian Democracy Essay987 Words   |  4 Pages Jacksonian Democracy nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Jacksonian (Democracy, Society, etc.) is a term used to describe reform during the time of Andrew Jackson’s Presidency. Specifically Jacksonian Democracy refers to â€Å"the general extension of democracy that characterized U.S. politics from 1824 to 1828.† Jacksonian Democracy and its support came primarily from the lower classes as a rebellion of sorts apposing the aristocracy. Even though it stressed equality, it was pro-slavery and anti-IndianRead MoreDictatorship And The Concept Of Good Government1221 Words   |  5 PagesDictatorship and the Concept of Good Government Introduction The government form of dictatorship (literally, ‘a chief magistrate’ from Latin ) is a form of government in which one person or a small group possesses absolute power without effective constitutional limitations , and is often stood in direct contrast to the government form of democracy (literally, ‘rule by the people’ from Latin ), a system of government in which all the people of a state... are involved in making decisions about itsRead MoreDirect Democracy Within A Representative System1485 Words   |  6 PagesOn a very basic level, direct democracy can be seen as mob rule or rule by decree. The system allows the mob to overrule the decisions made by the government, refusing any consistent social contracts between the citizens. In this pure form, direct democracy cannot even be considered a system of governance at all. It is not the most fair or just system. (Schneider). In order for any individual to indulge in a causal contract with other members of the society, it is necessary that they feel that theyRead MoreModernization Theory Of India s Democracy1722 Words   |  7 Pagessupport their emergence of democracy. The idea that economic development will lead to democratization and democratic consolidation generally holds for most cases. More often than not, increasing economic development increases the probability that any given society will have democratic politics. Although this theory is widely spread it does not seem to account for all cases, such as India. Due to the large population of India, the defying factors against modernization theory are not easily overlookedRead MoreHow Democratic Is China? Essay1727 Words   |  7 PagesDemocracy has been spread around the world due to globalization, and there are countries that are more democratic than others. Democracy is essentially a variable that can be measured. Democracy can be defined as a set of practices and principles, such as political participation and electoral processes, that protect freedoms and at minimum include the presence of free and fair elections, the protection of minority groups, the respect of human rights, and governe d by majority rule . The People’s RepublicRead MoreGlobalization: An Ideology of Western Elitists? Essay examples1229 Words   |  5 Pagesin the 21st century (Steger, 2002, 6). As a social and economic concept, globalization has its roots in neoliberalism which advocates: the primacy of economic growth, free trade to stimulate growth, a free market, individual choice, reduction of government regulation, and global social development based on a western model (Steger, 2002, 9). Although globalization is not a new concept, technological advancements in the last few decades have, for the first time in human history, allowed for real globalRead MoreHow Democratic The European Union1645 Words   |  7 Pagesspecial role of the European Union as â€Å"a system of polycentric governance† (Garner, 2009: 230), and the complex relationships between its institutions and the institutions of its member countries. Hereby taking into account that the â€Å"EU can be characterized as ‘a system of network governance’ in which ‘the ‘‘state’’ is vertically and horizontally segmented and its role has changed from authoritative allocation ‘‘from above’’ to the role of an ‘activator’ † (Crum and Fussom, 2009: 257). The EU withRead MoreThe Political Environment Of The Philippines1710 Words   |  7 Pagesmulti-party democracy which has an elected president along with its legislature. Their democracy is set up exactly the same as ours in the United States. They have the framework of where the president is both the head of state as well as the government in general. Similarly their system is composed of the three independent branches which are the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Under the leadership of the president, the executive branch makes the decisions for the government/country bodyRead MoreFreedom For The Organization Freedom House1466 Words   |  6 Page sthere is a trend that shows how authoritarian states tend to rank lower in terms of freedom as opposed to democratic states due to an importance being put on protecting certain groups. In authoritarian states, the government’s priority is ensuring their continued reign, whereas in democratic states, the government focuses more on the people as it is the people who have the power to change the government. Even though democracies can have corruption and limitations, they will still have more libertiesRead MoreAppraisal for Democracy by Plato, Aristotle and Thucydides1743 Words   |  7 PagesIn general, we can think of and consider democracy as a system or a structure of government made up of four key pillars. First, as a political system involved in choosing and interchanging the leadership through free and fair voting. The second pillar would be the active involvement of the citizens both in civic life and politics. Third is the safeguarding of the human rights of every cit izen. Then finally as rule of law, which apply equally in the society. However, for the purpose of this paper

Management for Resources and Strategies Gaps- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Management for Resources and Strategies Gaps. Answer: Introduction Due to poor farm management practices, lack of credit access and lack of input resources such as feed, land, water, vaccines and medicines, the production system's resources are damaged due to lack of awareness(Mushobozi, 2004). The following specific gaps affect the movement of various diary feeding systems. Spreading land and cattle rearing services and technology transfer is a miniature great resources gap in investment in the development of work and back-end infrastructure (Mugera Bitsch, 2005). Due to extreme deterioration and degradation of pasture land, there is a shortage of green cultivation, which is a breakthrough in any diary industry. The strategic gap of the dairy farms is on the production and price or use of debt which is main strategic gap found in our diary business. This strategic gap has been occurred due to the inexperience's strategic plan in animal husbandry and proper marketing plan. Recommendations for business units When a new pasture is planned for habitat or milking or a new pasture or food, the production site should be tested against the risk of pollution and should be protected by adequate measures if necessary. Should be evaluated for an agricultural farm (e. g pasture or new crop area Feed), re-use of land, availability of water resources and quality assessed, and possible pest effects of production on weed levels and disease and adjoining population, crop and especially in the natural environment, production should be avoided to destroy the site forest. The milking process and production should be correctly selected and managed so that the maximum Product quality, traceability, and safety (Bitsch, Kassa, Harsh Mugera, 2006). Milk storage and milking facilities will be regularly maintained and properly and cleaned. Likewise, the conveyance of drain to the customer is a way that will guarantee traceability and item quality. Sufficient availability of fertilizers, accounting resources of s oil, requirements of crop nutrition, surface and climate, a risk for pollution and underground water. Use a budget for nutrition defines fertilizer requirements. Justification People in almost all countries of the world do dairy products, and living one billion persons on the dairy farm. It is an important part in the system of world food, and it take an important role in durable condition of the rural zones in particular. This strategy is a significant fact which the dairy sector actively donates to the economy of several regions, countries and communities. A growing demand universal is significant now, and industrialization is global, thus growing the intensity and scope of global business of dairy, though, the query of in what way and what measures we can honestly evaluate the economic profits of dairy sector(Zhang, 2013). The dairy products are an important part of the receipt of the food industry. About 13 percent of the food is consumed by milk and dairy products. Food costs include twelve percent of disposable personal income Number one agricultural business in Dairy, Wisconsin, California, New York, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Idaho, New Mexico, Maine and Vermont in California alone, Dairy employs more than the 400,000-plus population of a thirty billion artisans. Overproduction and price of these two strategies create significant impact in the dairy industry, which is influenced by this industry and firms employed in this industry. References Bitsch, V., Kassa, G., Harsh, S., Mugera, A. (2006). human resource management risks:sources and control strategies based on dairy farmer focus groups.Journal Of Agricultural And Applied Economics. Retrieved from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/43753/2/123.pdf Mugera, A., Bitsch, V. (2005). International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.Managing Labor On Dairy Farms: A Resource-Based Perspective With Evidence From Case Studies*,8(3). Retrieved from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/8140/1/0803mu01.pdf Mushobozi, W. (2004). Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) on horticultural production for extension staff in Tanzania.Training Manual,2010. Retrieved from https://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Library/PPsDairy2009-2.pdf Mushobozi, W. (2010). Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) on horticultural production for extension staff in Tanzania.Training Manual. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1645e/i1645e00.pdf Zhang, D. (2013). COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES OF THE CHINESE DAIRY INDUSTRY MANUFACTURERS TO REBUILD REPUTATION AND MAINTAIN A QUALITY RELATIONSHIP.Journal Of Media And Communication,5(1). Retrieved from https://platformjmc.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/v5i1_zhang.pdf